财产性利益扩张下我国盗窃罪的边界

论文总字数：20616字

摘 要

在我国经济科技变革巨大的背景之下，各类财产性利益层出不穷，对于财产性利益能否作为盗窃罪客体的问题，各专家学者众说纷纭。笔者对于财产性利益纳入盗窃罪的客体范围持肯定的态度，认为财产性利益入罪也需要满足三方面的要素，包括：占有的转移，具备窃取行为以及存在利益的丧失与取得这一对应关系。以我国盗窃罪的构成为基本框架，对财产性利益边界界定的具体问题进行分析，在笔者看来：（一）在盗窃借条的案件中，行为人构成侵占罪；在盗窃欠条的情况下，如果行为人是因为持有对方货物而出具欠条，则构成侵占罪，如果是因为接受对方的服务而出具欠条，则构成盗窃罪。（二）犯意先行型的无钱食宿构成诈骗罪，食宿先行型的无钱食宿构成盗窃罪。（三）行为人将商家的收款二维码偷换为自己的二维码，行为人构成诈骗罪而非盗窃罪。（四）行为人乘坐出租车不付款的行为，构成盗窃罪，盗窃的是司机对乘客享有的债权，即财产性利益。文章的最后，在理论探讨的基础上，提出更好应对现实生活中财产性利益入罪的立法建议。

关键词：财产性利益 盗窃 欠条 盗用

Abstract

The Under the background of tremendous changes in China's economic and technological sciences, various types of property interests have emerged in an endless stream. Experts and scholars have differed views on whether property interests can serve as the object of theft. The author holds a positive attitude toward the inclusion of property interests in the object range of theft and believes that property interests need to satisfy three elements, including the transfer of possession, possession of stolen behavior, and the loss of the existence of interests and the acquisition of this pair of counterparts. relationship. Taking the composition of theft in our country as the basic framework, we analyze the specific issues of the boundary of property interests. In my opinion: (a) In the case of stolen articles, the perpetrator constitutes the crime of embezzlement; in the case of theft, if the perpetrator issues an irrigation due to possession of the goods of the other party, it constitutes the crime of embezzlement if it is issued because of receiving the other party's services. Immigration constitutes theft. (b) Conspiracy to commit fraudulent crimes that constitute the first type of money-free food and accommodation, accommodation and lodging of the type of money-free food and accommodation constitute theft. (c) The actor has stolen the QR code of the merchant's payment into his own QR code, and the actor has committed fraud instead of theft. (d) The actor's behavior of not paying by taxi constitutes theft, and the theft is the claim that the driver has on the passenger, that is, property interests. At the end of the article, on the basis of theoretical discussions, we propose legislative proposals to better deal with the criminalization of property interests in real life.

Keywords: Property Interests，Theft，Irrigation，Misappropriation

目 录

摘 要 ………………………………………………………………………………………Ⅰ

Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………Ⅱ

一、问题的提出 ………………………………………………………………………………1

二、财产性利益的判别 ………………………………………………………………………2

（一）财产性利益的概念 ………………………………………………………………2

（二）财物与财产性利益的区别 ………………………………………………………2

三、盗窃罪的对象是否能够包括财产性利益 ………………………………………………3

（一）否定理论 …………………………………………………………………………3

（二）肯定理论 …………………………………………………………………………4

四、财产性利益构成盗窃必须符合相应要件 ………………………………………………4

（一）占有 ………………………………………………………………………………5

（二）窃取行为 …………………………………………………………………………5

（三）利益的丧失与取得 ………………………………………………………………6

五、财产性利益边界界定的具体问题 ………………………………………………………6

（一）盗窃借条、欠条 …………………………………………………………………6

（二）无钱食宿 …………………………………………………………………………9

（三）偷换二维码 ………………………………………………………………………10

（四）劳务 ………………………………………………………………………………11

六、立法建议 …………………………………………………………………………………12

参考文献 ……………………………………………………………………………………14

致 谢 …………………………………………………………………………………… 15

剩余内容已隐藏，请支付后下载全文，论文总字数：20616字