刷单炒信的入刑分析

论文总字数：23403字

摘 要

刷单炒信行为作为一种源于迅速发展中的电子商务行业的新型违法行为，不同于传统的扰乱市场秩序行为，这体现在其不仅破坏了电子商务交易平台的信用评价机制，还具有法益侵害的复合型等特征。对这一行为，仅仅依靠电商平台规则和传统的民商、行政等部门法的规制无法实现有效治理，因此，必须在此基础上，以法益保护为导向，以坚持刑法谦抑性原则为前提，将刷单炒信行为纳入刑法的治理范围内，更好地对网络交易秩序予以规制和保障。

本文以司法实践中最常见的正向刷单炒信行为为研究重点，全文共分为三个部分：其中第一部分系对刷单炒信行为从不同角度进行解释定性，明确其具体的主体和行为模式，在此基础上进行分类，针对不同类型的刷单炒信行为明确其侵害的具体法益。第二部分在结合现有自治规则、行政规章和经济法规制的基础上，对刷单炒信行为的非刑法规制现状与问题进行分析，从而得出刑法介入的必要性结论。第三部分分别从现有罪名的规制路径选择和司法解释、前置法路径出发，为刷单炒信行为入刑提供了具体思路分析和选择。

关键词：刷单炒信 经济法规制 入刑路径 谦抑性原则

ABSTRACT

As a new type of illegal behavior originated from the rapidly developing electronic commerce industry, the behavior of credit hype is different from the traditional behavior of disrupting the market order, which is reflected in that it not only destroys the credit evaluation mechanism of the electronic commerce trading platform. It also has the characteristics of compound infringement of legal interests. For this behavior, only relying on the rules of e-commerce platform and the regulation of traditional civil and commercial, administrative and other departmental laws can not achieve effective governance. Therefore, on this basis, we must take the protection of legal interests as the guide, and adhere to the principle of modesty in criminal law as the premise. The behavior of brushing orders is brought into the scope of criminal law to better regulate and guarantee the order of network transactions.

This paper focuses on the most common behavior of positive brushing letters in judicial practice. The full text is divided into three parts. The first part is to explain and characterize the behavior of brushing letters from different angles, and to clarify its specific subject and behavior mode. On this basis, the classification is carried out, and the specific legal interests of the infringement are made clear for different types of letter-brushing behavior. In the second part, on the basis of combining the existing autonomous rules, administrative regulations and economic law regulation, this paper analyzes the present situation and problems of the non-criminal law regulation of the act of brushing orders and speculating letters, so as to draw the conclusion of the necessity of criminal law intervention. The third part, from the existing crime regulation path choice and judicial interpretation, the front law path, provides the concrete train of thought analysis and the choice for the single order speculation behavior to enter the punishment.

Key words: credit hype，economic law，criminalization route，principle of good faith

目 录

摘 要 ………………………………………………………………………… Ⅰ

Abstract ……………………………………………………………………… Ⅱ

1. 绪论 …………………………………………………………………………1

二、刷单炒信行为的定性 ………………………………………………………1

（一） 行为界定…………………………………………………………………1

（二） 主要类型 …………………………………………………………………2

三、刷单行为治理现状……………………………………………………………3

（一）电商平台管理规则 ………………………………………………………3

（二）行政法规制…………………………………………………………………3

（三）经济法规制…………………………………………………………………4

四、刷单炒信的入刑分析 ……………………………………………………… 6

（一）入刑必要性分析……………………………………………………………6

（二）司法实践中的问题…………………………………………………………7

（三）现行刑法框架下的入罪思路………………………………………………8

1.非法经营罪…………………………………………………………………8

2.虚假广告罪…………………………………………………………………9

3.非法利用网络信息罪………………………………………………………10

（四）其他路径——司法解释与前置法…………………………………………10

五、结语……………………………………………………………………………12

参考文献……………………………………………………………………………14

致谢 ………………………………………………………………………………16

1. 绪论

自2009年开始兴起的天猫“双十一”大规模促销活动是我国电商行业迅速发展的一个缩影，据统计，2018年天猫双11活动的全天交易额已经迅速增长至2135亿元。这无彰显着电子商务的蓬勃发展和强劲潜力，然而这些庞大的数据背后却隐藏着不少潜在的威胁。相比较与传统的线下交易方式，网购存在着买卖双方身份信用信息难以认证、异地交易安全性降低、维权须经第三方介入等问题，而刷单炒信行为正是其中最为严重的一个方面。

剩余内容已隐藏，请支付后下载全文，论文总字数：23403字