论刑法上“多因一果”型因果关系的归责

论文总字数：16323字

摘 要

关键词：多因一果 ；因果关系 ；条件说 ；相当因果关系说 ；归责

Expound the imputation in“several causes and one effect" type of causal relationship

25011225 YANG ZHENYUAN

Supervised by LIANG YUNBAO

Abstract：In criminal judicial practice, causal relationship plays a crucial role in determing crime or non-crime, this crime and that crime, misdemeanor and felony . Many theories to find the logical relationship between cause and effect derived from the causation of criminal law, such as the theory of condition, the theory of common possibility and the theory of objective attribution. But in the criminal jurisprudence field of our conntry, any consensus has not been reached up to now .Tracing it’scause, the aforementioned theories all need to be improved. Take the theory of condition for instance, though adopted in most of the cases, it emphasizes form determining, thus may enlarge the causation to an inappropriate degree. That is where the scholars criticize. The theory of common possibility may have the tendency to be a little more generally taken, but how to define it is a confusion for scholars. Taking all the theories into consideration, court adjudications may be different when faced with the "several causes and one effect" type case,.To sum it up, it is practically necessary to study the problem of imputation in“several causes and one effect" type of causal relationship and also necessary to reflect the theory of causation.

Key words: several causes and one effect ; causal relationship ; the theory of condition ; the theory of common possibility ; imputation

目 录

摘 要………………………………………………………………………………I

Abstract……………………………………………………………………………II

前 言………………………………………………………………………………1

1. 因果关系概述…………………………………………………………………1
2. 案例分析………………………………………………………………………1
3. 案例一………………………………………………………………………2
4. 案例二………………………………………………………………………2
5. 对比分析……………………………………………………………………2
6. 对因果关系理论的分析与反思……………………………………………3

(一)因果关系理论辨析……………………………………………………3

（二）因果关系对犯罪构成的影响…………………………………………………4

四、介入因素概述…………………………………………………………………5

1. 因果关系的介入因素的概念和特征………………………………………6
2. 因果关系的介入因素的类型及认定………………………………………6

1、介入因素为行为……………………………………………………6

2、介入因素为被害人的特殊体质……………………………………………7

3、介入因素为事件……………………………………………………7

1. 因果关系的介入因素成立中断的条件……………………………………8

结 论……………………………………………………………………………9

参考文献……………………………………………………………………………11

谢 辞………………………………………………………………………………12

论刑法上“多因一果”型因果关系的归责

前 言

我国目前关于因果关系的理论与实践存在不少问题，其中“多因一果”型因果关系的归责问题身份突出，尤其是自然力型“多因一果”型因果关系的归责问题，因此，在这样的背景下，研究如何恰当的让行为人承担相应而不过多的责任，对于丰富刑法因果关系的归责理论，解决实践中遇到的难题具有重要的意义。在刑事司法实践中，因果关系对于判定罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪、轻罪与重罪发挥着至关重要的作用。在刑法学因果关系的语境下，衍生出多种理论来判定因果之间的逻辑关联，如条件说、相当因果关系说、客观归责理论等，但目前我国刑法学界并无统一共识。究其原因，各个理论都有其自身尚需完善的地方，比如条件说，虽然司法实践中多采此观点，但该理论本身注重形式判定，易扩大因果关系范围已为不少学者所诟病。相当因果关系说虽然有渐成通说之趋势，但就相当性如何界定的问题亦为学者所困惑。在这样的理论背景下，面对所谓“多因一果”型因果关系的案件，法院的判决亦往往有所不同。因此，探讨“多因一果”型因果关系的归责问题并反思因果关系理论实属必要。

一、因果关系概述

剩余内容已隐藏，请支付后下载全文，论文总字数：16323字